Quellen zur Bewertung der Tiergerechtheit - Schweinemast

Auf den nachfolgenden Literaturquellen basiert die Bewertung des Tiergerechtheitspotenzials von Haltungsverfahren der Schweinemast in der Web-Anwendung InKalkTier.

Die Bewertung der Funktionskreise "Futter- und Wasseraufnahme" sowie "Ruhen und Schlafen" erfolgte auf Basis der Einschätzung der projektbegleitenden Arbeitsgruppe "Bewertung von Haltungsverfahren hinsichtlich Tiergerechtheit".

Literatur

Baxter, E. M.;, Lawrence, A. B.; Edwards, S. A. (2011) Alternative farrowing systems: design criteria for farrowing systems based on the biological needs of sows and piglets. Animal, 5(4):580-600, ISSN 1751-7311. [1]

Beattie, V. E.; Walker, N.; Sneddon, I. A. (1998) Preference Testing of Substrates by Growing Pigs. Animal Welfare, 7(1):27-34 [2]

Bracke, M.; Spoolder, H. (2023) Review of wallowing in pigs: implications for animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 20(3):347-363 [3]

Caldas, E. D., Michelon, A., Foppa, L., Simonelli, S. M., Pierozan, C. R., Dario, J. G. N., Duarte, J. V. S., Silva, C. C. R., & Silva, C. A. (2021). Effect of stocking density and use of environmental enrichment materials on the welfare and the performance of pigs in the growth and finishing phases. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 18(4), e0504. [4]

Day, J. E. L.; van de Weerd, H. A.; Edwards, S. A. (2008) The effect of varying lengths of straw bedding on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 109 (2–4):249-260, ISSN 0168-1591. [5]

Dellmeier, G. R.; Friend, T. H. (1991) Behavior and extensive management of domestic sows (Sus scrofa) and litters. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 29 (1–4):327-341, ISSN 0168-1591. [6]

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2007) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission on Animal health and welfare in fattening pigs in relation to housing and husbandry. The EFSA Journal (2007) 564, 1-14 [7]

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2007). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission on Animal health and welfare aspects of different housing and husbandry systems for adult breeding boars, pregnant, farrowing sows and unweaned piglets. The EFSA Journal (2007) 572, 1-13 [8]

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2022) EFSA AHAW Panel (EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare), Nielsen, S. S.; Alvarez, J.; Bicout, D. J.; Calistri, P.; Canali, E.; Drewe, J. A.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Gonzales Rojas, J. L.; Gortázar Schmidt, C.; Herskin, M.; Michel, V.; Miranda Chueca, M. A.; Padalino, B.; Roberts, H. C.; Stahl, K.; Velarde, A.; Viltrop, A.; Winckler, C.; Edwards, S.; Ivanova, S.: Leeb, C.; Wechsler, B.; Fabris, C.; Lima, E.; Mosbach-Schulz, O.; Van der Stede, Y.; Vitali, M.; Spoolder, H. Scientific Opinion on the welfare of pigs on farm. EFSA Journal 2022; 20(8):7421, 319 pp. [9]

Godyń, D.; Nowicki, J.; Herbut, P. Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare—A Review. Animals. 2019; 9(6):383. [10]

Vermeer, H. M. & Aarnink, A. J. (2023) Review on heat stress in pigs on farm. Zenodo. [11]

Kauselmann, K.; Krause, E. T.; Glitz, B.; Gallmann, E.; Schrade, H.; Schrader, L. (2020) Short-term choice of fattening pigs for additional plant-based materials. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Volume 226, 104975, ISSN 0168-1591. [12]

Mwanjali, S.; Smidt, D. & Ellendorff, F. (1983). A multiple free choice model for pigs. Applied Animal Ethology, 9(3-4), 263-271. [13]

Nielsen, B. L.; Lawrence, A. B. & Whittemore, C. T. (1995). Effect of group size on feeding behaviour, social behaviour, and performance of growing pigs using single-space feeders. Livestock Production Science, 44(1), 73-85. [14]

Rasmussen, D. K.; Weber, R. & Wechsler, B. (2006). Effects of animal/feeding-place ratio on the behaviour and performance of fattening pigs fed via sensor-controlled liquid feeding. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 98(1-2), 45-53. [15]

Rodenburg, T. B. & Koene, P. (2007). The impact of group size on damaging behaviours, aggression, fear and stress in farm animals. Applied animal behaviour Science, 103(3-4), 205-214. [16]

Taylor, N. R.; Main, D. C.; Mendl, M. & Edwards, S. A. (2010). Tail-biting: a new perspective. The Veterinary Journal, 186(2), 137-147. [17]

Turner, S. P.; Edwards, S. A. & Bland, V. C. (1999). The influence of drinker allocation and group size on the drinking behaviour, welfare and production of growing pigs. Animal Science, 68(4), 617-624. [18]

Turner, S. P.; Sinclair, A. G. & Edwards, S. A. (2000). The interaction of liveweight and the degree of competition on drinking behaviour in growing pigs at different group sizes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 67(4), 321-334. [19]

Vermeer, H. M.; Dirx-Kuijken, N. C. & Bracke, M. B. (2017). Exploration Feeding and Higher Space Allocation Improve Welfare of Growing-Finishing Pigs. Animals 75: 36. [20]

Rodríguez-Estévez, V.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, M.; Gómez-Castro, A. G. & Edwards, S. A. (2010). Group sizes and resting locations of free range pigs when grazing in a natural environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 127(1-2), 28-36. [21]

Wimmler, C.; Vermeer, H. M.; Leeb, C.; Salomon, E. & Andersen, H. L. (2022). Concrete outdoor runs for organic growing-finishing pigs–a legislative, ethological and environmental perspective. Animal, 16(1), 100435. [22]